Elisabetta Cocciaretto vs Jule Niemeier Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 Apr at 02:24 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Cocciaretto vs J. Niemeier

ITA
1
Win
Played
1
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Cocciaretto 1 - 1 Niemeier
They have played 5 sets in total, with Elisabetta Cocciaretto winning 2 and Jule Niemeier winning 3. The last match between Elisabetta Cocciaretto and Jule Niemeier was at the Catalonia Open - Vic, 28-04-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 2-6 7-6(5) 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cocciaretto | 1 |
| Niemeier | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Catalonia Open - Vic(04-28-25)
(F) Makarska Open 125 - Makarska(06-05-22)
E. Cocciaretto vs J. Niemeier H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,903,234 | Career Prize Money | $1,768,340 |
| 60.61% (220-143) | Career Total W/L | 56.30% (219-170) |
| 1 | Clay | 1 |
| 11 | Titles | 5 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 43.59% (17-22) | YTD Win/Loss | 22.22% (2-7) |
E. Cocciaretto vs J. Niemeier Match Preview:
Analyzing the second serve performance over the recent half-year period reveals that Cocciaretto has achieved a 41.36% success rate in winning points on their second serve. This slightly edges out Niemeier's 40.84%, suggesting a marginal advantage to Cocciaretto in this aspect. Historical statistics indicate a strong correlation between second serve performance and the likelihood of securing a match victory.
Evaluating their return statistics, Cocciaretto has captured 46.48% of points on their opponent's second serve when measured over the same time frame. However, Niemeier demonstrates superior capability, gaining 50.86% in this area, which may provide her an edge. Regarding first serve return efficacy, Niemeier has achieved 30.74% success against Cocciaretto's 32.14%. These statistics are instrumental in projecting favoritism in direct matchups.
In analyzing performance under duress, Cocciaretto prevails by saving 52.49% of breakpoints, surpassing Niemeier's 45.45%. This skill is particularly valuable for in-game betting as it can influence the dynamic of closely contested matches. Looking at their match outcomes over the past year, Cocciaretto holds a win rate of 44.19% (19 wins to 24 losses), while Niemeier records a comparable win rate of 44.9% (22 wins to 27 losses), painting a broad picture of their match resilience.
Delving deeper into their proficiency on various surfaces, both competitors excel on Clay, with Cocciaretto securing 66% (124 wins to 64 losses) and Niemeier close behind at 65% (128 wins to 69 losses). Conversely, Cocciaretto outperforms on Hard courts with a 53% win rate (52 wins to 47 losses), whereas Niemeier trails with 44% (38 wins to 49 losses), potentially advantageous if the match unfolds on hard surfaces.
When considering their presence in higher-tier competitions, Cocciaretto has participated predominantly on the Main tour with a 42.11% success rate (8 wins to 11 losses). Niemeier, contrastingly, demonstrates a lower Main tour success rate of 30.77% (4 wins to 9 losses). This context provides insight into players’ adaptability to various competition levels.
Examining their head-to-head encounters, Niemeier currently leads with a 1-0 record over Cocciaretto, having secured a win in their sole previous meeting at the Makarska Open 125. This victory transpired on clay in a two-set victory (7-5, 6-1), lending Niemeier an upper hand in their rivalry. The average match period between them stands at 1:39:0, though they have yet to contest a deciding set or tiebreak.
The level of competition they have faced over the past year reveals Cocciaretto's opponents averaged a rank of 133.88, whereas Niemeier's stood at 137.16. In potential ennervated match situations, Cocciaretto shows promise by winning 60% of deciding sets in the past year compared to Niemeier's 33% in similar scenarios.
Considering break point conversion rates, Cocciaretto has turned 36.54% of opportunities into breaks, slightly outperforming Niemeier's 34.17%. These figures are particularly telling for live betting scenarios when either player reaches breakpoint opportunities.
Evaluating all available statistics, Cocciaretto emerges with minor statistical advantages in multiple crucial areas, including second serve points, breakpoint conversion, and performance under pressure. Consequently, Cocciaretto appears to be the slight favorite to clinch victory in their upcoming matchup based on empirical data.
Elisabetta Cocciaretto vs Jule Niemeier Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Cocciaretto vs J. Niemeier H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 21 | Games Won | 28 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
| 2:5:8 | Average Match Time | 2:5:8 |
| 66% (113/171) | 1st Serve % | 55% (87/158) |
| 50% (56/113) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (51/87) |
| 43% (25/58) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (33/71) |
| 53% (9/17) | Break Pts Won % | 54% (13/24) |
| 47% (74/158) | Return Points Win % | 53% (90/171) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Cocciaretto Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 3-0 ret. | ||
QF | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-7(7) 6-2 | ||
J. Niemeier Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 1-6 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||

E. Cocciaretto vs J. Niemeier Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.61% (220/143) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.30% (219/170) |
| 58.17% (484/348) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.53% (502/386) |
| 53.08% (4138/3658) | Games Win/Loss | 52.82% (4349/3885) |
| 51.72% (60/56) | Hard Win/Loss | 43.33% (39/51) |
| 66.00% (132/68) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.68% (131/78) |
| 55.56% (15/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.36% (31/25) |
| 65.00% (13/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 52.94% (18/16) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 394 | Aces Total | 1343 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.56 |
| 1091 | Total Double Faults | 2244 |
| 1:41:16 | Average Match Time | 1:38:7 |
| 335.79 | Average Opponent Rank | 361.26 |
| 66% (16431/24898) | 1st Serve % | 56% (14687/26276) |
| 60% (9888/16431) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (9704/14660) |
| 47% (3985/8467) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (5200/11627) |
| 49% (1545/3169) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1534/3275) |
| 47% (11536/24753) | Return Points Win % | 45% (11879/26206) |
| 57.45% (27/20) | Slam W/L | 59.09% (26/18) |
| 35.56% (16/29) | Masters W/L | 34.62% (9/17) |
| 58.33% (7/5) | Cups W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 53.47% (54/47) | Main Tour W/L | 48.94% (46/48) |
| 74.66% (109/37) | Challenger W/L | 61.39% (124/78) |
| 58.33% (7/5) | Futures W/L | 75.00% (12/4) |
| 61% (220/363) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (214/378) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 60% (53/88) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (38/75) |
| 58% (62/106) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (51/117) |
| 87% (205/179) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (235/199) |
| 13% (205/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (235/36) |
| 26% (158/41) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (154/20) |